Batman Movie Massacre

Arapahoe County sheriff: Only courts can rule on gun control

"Public safety professionals serving in the executive branch do not have the constitutional authority, responsibility, and in most cases, the credentials to determine the constitutionality of any issue"

AURORA | The Colorado sheriff whose county includes the movie theater where 12 people were shot and killed last year says law-enforcement officers have no right to ignore gun-control laws unless the courts rule them unconstitutional.

Arapahoe County Sheriff Grayson Robinson issued a statement Tuesday criticizing police and sheriff’s officials who have said they would not enforce gun-control laws they consider unconstitutional. Parts of that essay appear in the opinion section of AuroraSentinel.com, and in the Jan. 24 print edition of the Aurora Sentinel.

Arapahoe County Sheriff Grayson Robinson has a different take on proposed gun-control legislation than his counterparts to the north. In a letter Robinson sent to constituents Tuesday, the sheriff said that he supports the right to bear arms and that it is his duty to uphold the Constitution.Arapahoe County Sheriff Grayson Robinson has a different take on proposed gun-control legislation than his counterparts to the north. In a letter Robinson sent to constituents Tuesday, the sheriff said that he supports the right to bear arms and that it is his duty to uphold the Constitution.

Weld County Sheriff John Cooke has said he wouldn’t enforce any of Obama’s plan to address gun laws, and sheriffs in at least four Oregon counties said in a letter to Vice President Joe Biden they wouldn’t work with federal officials to enforce potential gun laws they consider unconstitutional.

Gun control was thrust back into the national debate after the mass shootings at the theater in the Denver suburb of Aurora in July, and at a school in Newtown, Conn., in December, where a gunman killed 27 people, mostly young children.

President Barack Obama has proposed a series of measures to curb violence, triggering a heated response from some gun-rights supporters.

Robinson said only courts — and not law-enforcement officers — have the authority to determine whether a law is unconstitutional.

For a law enforcement official to claim that authority would be the equivalent of police officers or deputies deciding that people they arrest are guilty and sentencing them to jail, he said.

 

GRAYSON ROBINSON’S ESSAY ON SHERIFFS, THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND MENTAL HEALTH

“Public safety professionals serving in the executive branch do not have the constitutional authority, responsibility, and in most cases, the credentials to determine the constitutionality of any issue,” he said.

page1.Grayson-Robinson-SheriffArapahoe County Sheriff Grayson Robinson

Robinson said he supports gun rights under the Second Amendment.

Justin Smith, a fellow Colorado sheriff in Larimer County, has said on Facebook that he wouldn’t enforce unconstitutional laws, but his spokesman has said Smith wouldn’t try to determine on his own what is constitutional.

Robinson’s deputies were among the responders who rushed to the Aurora theater after a gunman opened fire, killing a dozen people and injuring 70. His deputies also are guarding suspect James Holmes in the county jail, and they escort him to and from court appearances and stand guard during hearings.

Aurora city police are in charge of the investigation.

Holmes faces multiple counts of murder and attempted murder. He has not entered a plea.

In his statement, Robinson also said that mental health and gangs do not get the attention they deserve in the debate over gun violence.

 

This entry was posted in Batman Movie Massacre, Metro Aurora, News, The Community, z news. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Jason

    I respect his thoughtful letter and he makes a valid point, that it is not up to sheriffs to define what is constitutional or not. That said he has moral obligation and pledge to the citizens of Arapahoe county to not just blindly follow orders.

    Should a law that is blatantly unconstitutional be followed until it is overturned in the courts? I say that until the courts decide on the legality of a law, it his duty to protect citizens from unjust regulations.

    I for one will not be voting for him on the next election unless he clarifies his position. I don’t feel he’s motives are ill intentioned, but it concerns me when an officer of the law states he will blindly follow orders.

  • http://www.facebook.com/can.okorn.1 Can O’Korn

    A report recently released confirms that psychotropic drugs have been involved in 9 out of 10 school shootings.

    Disarming an entire society because big-pharma wants to dope us all up with SSRI’s is about as nutty as it gets.

  • more of the same

    Does Sheriff Robinson handle immigration violations to the letter of the law? Or does he follow the Feds lax recommendations on procedures? Is this another case of selective enforcement that is becoming so commonplace?

  • Tater

    Some people are just like sheep, others guard the sheep

  • http://twitter.com/redco2012 redco2012

    Sheriff Robinson has always being on the opposite side of the 2nd Amendment. Hence why all of his county’s CCW holders are inserted into a database, presumably along with real criminals.

  • Pingback: small business ideas

  • Pingback: bicycle Trailer

  • Pingback: http://paintlesstoolsonline.com

  • Pingback: www.rolety-decora.pl

  • Pingback: www.warszawa.semstar.pl

  • Pingback: www.e-wizytowki.net

  • Pingback: mesothelioma cancer attorney Colorado

  • Pingback: willatatry.pl

  • Pingback: mesothelioma cancer attorney

  • Pingback: boutique de vetement enfant

  • Pingback: top 100 mlm companies

  • Pingback: επισκευή υπολογιστών

  • Pingback: joe leavers

  • Pingback: weblink

  • Pingback: forum.openstreetmap.org

  • Pingback: hiviz printed

  • Pingback: Jesus

  • Pingback: Marla